Girlhood as seen in a Mary Cassatt painting

This week’s essay is guest edited by Miriam Musco. Miriam Musco is a museum educator at the Sciencenter, a children’s science museum in Ithaca, New York.  She earned a B.A. in history from Indiana University and her M.A. in Museum Education from the University of the Arts, and is the author of the blog The Medium is the Museum

 The experience of girlhood, as you can probably imagine, has changed a lot since the close of the nineteenth century. Nowadays, girls have a wide variety of activities they can participate in and many different toys, games, technologies and retailers competing for their attention.Some girls even occupy the media spotlight, as a slew of recent articles on Barack Obama’s two daughters and the popularity of the reality television series Here Comes Honey Boo Boo have shown.1

But in the Victorian Era, girls were still defined by rigid gender codes that were imposed upon all women, and girlhood was only just being explored in art. Favored as subjects by the Impressionists, middle- and upper-class girls were often depicted either as innocents in naturalistic settings or as decorative objects (echoing the place their mothers were thought to occupy in society).

Mary Cassatt
American, 1844 – 1926
Little Girl in a Blue Armchair, 1878
oil on canvas
Collection of Mr. and Mrs. Paul Mellon

It fell to the iconoclastic painter Mary Cassatt, a rare example of a nineteenth century woman who was self-supported, to break this mold. In Young Girl in Blue Armchair, which now hangs in the National Gallery of Art in Washington D.C., Cassatt showed a very realistic girl. She is not posed, primped and proper; instead,she is lounging on a sofa, one arm tucked under her head, with neither her knees nor her ankles crossed – a posture that would have been considered highly indecent in a grown woman.  Her figure imitates the sleepy dog sitting nearby, connecting her boredom at being made to sit for a portrait with the monotony a pet might experience sitting around its family’s house all day.  The way she arranges herself is even more out of place if you consider the girl’s surroundings – a neat room with matching furniture – and the way she is carefully dressed, both of which are hallmarks of upper-class Victorian families.

Though it seems like just another domestic scene of its era, this painting was something different for art audiences at the time. It showed that girls were not just dolls to be dressed up or idealized pure spirits, but were living, breathing humans with feelings and, sometimes, a sense of impropriety.  We are able to read the emotions of this girl Cassatt depicted, yet she is still behaving within the confines of what was expected of girls of her social status.

Young Girl in Blue Armchair is one of the featured images in Defining Our Terms, the inaugural exhibit of the online Girl Museum.2 Girl Museum is dedicated to showing different facets of girlhood throughout history and across the globe, showing that girlhood is not a monolithic experience but instead varied across time and location and even within the same culture. Girl Museum celebrates the variety of true experiences ofgirlhood as lived by real girls. What Mary Cassatt explored in her painting is what allows for modern-day girls to express themselves in their own ways.

As Girl Museum adds on new exhibits, its curators will be looking for more objects that represent unique aspects of girlhood. Those might be depictions of girls, artifacts that girls have used, or documentation girls have left behind about their lives – anything that can show us the thoughts and desires of average girls indifferent places and times.


1 Eric Wilson, “White House Style Watch Expands by Two”,


Categories: Guest Edited PostingsBookmark

6 Responses to Girlhood as seen in a Mary Cassatt painting RSS Comments (RSS)

  1. Annette Lachmann says:

    Great blog. I especially liked the art work (the painting by Mary Cassatt) and the comments about it.


  2. Annette Lachmann says:

    I enjoyed seeing your blog very much. That painting by Mary Cassatt is interesting.

    Annette Lachmann

  3. Beverly Podraza says:

    I enjoyed your article on R. Gleason and Sons. I am the happy owner of one of their table casters dated 1856 and clearly marked. The bottle holders are removable, three of them. It also has a dinner bell attached to the top. I do not know where to find out the value of the piece. I do not have the original 6 bottles.

    Any help you can provide is appreciated.

    Thank you

    • Hillary Murtha says:

      Dear Beverly, if you will send an email me about your caster privately, I will do my best to help. I have a policy never to provide objects’ monetary values publicly on this blog, since museums generally prefer, for security reasons, that the value of the various objects in their collections does not become widely publicized.

    • Hillary Murtha says:

      Dear Beverly,
      I received so many inquiries about the Gleason castor that I just wrote up a new posting about it. See today’s (Sept 17th) posting.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>

Fatal error: Call to undefined function facebook_button() in /home/content/72/9855472/html/wordpress/wp-content/themes/wpstart/sidebar.php on line 11